GPT-4o mini
High-speed, ultra-affordable multimodal small model designed to replace GPT-3.5 Turbo at 60% lower cost.
128k
Tokens
16.384k
Output limit
Multimodal Small Transformer
Model family
Not Disclosed
Total / Active
$0.15
Per 1M tokens
$0.60
Per 1M tokens
Model Overview
GPT-4o mini brings multimodal vision and text intelligence at an industry-disrupting price point of $0.15/MTok input and $0.60/MTok output. It supports tool calling, structured outputs, and fine-tuning.
Developer Implementation Notes
Supports strict structured outputs and vision inputs at miniature model pricing. 50% prompt cache discount brings input cost to $0.075/MTok.
Key Strengths
- Incredible cost-to-performance ratio ($0.15 / MTok input)
- Multimodal vision capabilities at budget pricing
- High throughput rate limits on OpenAI platform
- Supports fine-tuning
Limitations & Boundaries
- Lower accuracy on deep mathematical proofs and Olympic competitions
- Context window limited to 128k tokens
Capabilities & Modalities
Best Production Use Cases
- High-volume content moderation & classification
- Customer support chatbots
- Lightweight data parsing & batch JSON conversion
Verified Benchmark Results
Standardized evaluations with methodology notes and authoritative citation links.
Pricing & Inference Cost Calculator
Token Cost Estimator – GPT-4o mini
Calculate projected inference spend with prompt caching
Quick Workload Presets
$0.3000
2.00M input tokens
$0.3000
0.50M output tokens
$0.60
Avg: $0.00060 / req
Compare with Similar Models
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic's first hybrid reasoning frontier model with dynamic thinking budget control and state-of-the-art coding capabilities.
Gemini 2.0 Pro (Experimental)
Google's flagship intelligence model engineered for complex coding, mathematical proofs, and 2M token context.
OpenAI o3-mini
Next-generation cost-efficient reasoning model optimized for STEM, competitive math, and coding.
Data Accuracy & Verification Notice
AI model specifications, pricing records, and benchmark metrics published on this platform are compiled directly from authoritative sources (official provider documentation, research papers, and verified evaluation harnesses). Benchmark results reflect specific test harnesses and prompting methodologies; scores are not directly comparable across differing evaluation setups.